Applied measures for breaches of the AML-CTF law 2021
| Date | Entity subject to an impact measure (name) | Type | Violations of legislation | Impact measures | Information on complaints about sanctions measures |
| 2021-11-30 | UAB “1PARTNER.LT” | Real Estate Broker | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9(1), point (1), (12), (14), (15), (16), (17) and (18), Article 10(6) and (7), Article 19(1), (7), (8), (9) and (10), Article 22(1) and (2), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2021-11-30 | UAB “Centro kubas-real estate” | Real Estate Broker | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9(1), point 1, Article 19(1), (7), (8), (9) and (10), Article 22(1) and (2), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2021-12-01 | UAB “NT Savas namai” | Developer of real estate | Breaches of the requirements of Article 19(1), (3), (8), (9), (10), 20(3), 22(1) and (6), 29(1) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2021-12-01 | UAB “Rebest” | Developer of real estate | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 19(1), (7), (8), (9), (10), 22(1) and (6), and Article 29(1) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2021-12-02 | UAB “Rea LT” | Real Estate Broker | Breaches of the requirements of Article 9(3), Article 19(1), (3), (9), Article 20(3), (4) and (5), Article 22(1), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2021-12-02 | UAB “Viktauga” | Developer of real estate | Breaches of the requirements of Article 19(1), (3), (8), (9), (10), 20(3), 22(1) and (6), 29(1) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | |
| 2021-12-02 | MB “NT Ministry” | Real Estate Broker | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9(1), point (1), (12), (14), (15), (16), (17) and (18), Article 10(6) and (7), Article 19(1), (7), (8), (9) and (10), Article 22(1) and (2), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | |
| 2021-12-02 | UAB “Oberstata” | Real Estate Broker | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9(1), point (1), (12), (14), (15), (16), (17) and (18), Article 10(6) and (7), Article 19(1), (7), (8), (9) and (10), Article 22(1) and (2), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law.Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9(1), point (1), (12), (14), (15), (16), (17) and (18), Article 10(6) and (7), Article 19(1), (7), (8), (9) and (10), Article 22(1) and (2), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2021-12-07 | UAB “Britauto” | Trader in chash | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Articles 19(1), 19(3), 19(8), 19(9), 20(3), 22(1), 29(1) of the AML-CFT law. | Warning | |
| 2021-12-07 | UAB “Butu bankas” | Developer of real estate | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9(12), (14) to (18), Article 10(6) and (7), Article 19(1), (8) to (10), Article 22(1) and (2), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | |
| 2021-12-07 | JSC “Hausa” | Real Estate Broker | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9(1), point (1), (12), (14) to (18), Article 10(6) and (7), Article 19(1), (7) to (10), Article 22(1) and (2), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | |
| 2021-12-15 | JSC “Gijoneda” | Real Estate Broker | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 19(1), (7) to (10) and Article 22(1) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | |
| 2021-12-15 | UAB “Inreal” | Developer of real estate | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Articles 9(1)(1), (12) to (18), 10(6) and (7), 19(10), 22(1) and (2), 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2021-12-15 | UAB “Dainavos apartamentai” | Developer of real estate | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Articles 9(3), 19(1) and (3), 20(3), (4) and (5), 22(1), 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Warning | |
| 2021-12-15 | UAB “City Houses” | Developer of real estate | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Articles 9(3), 19(1) and (3), 20(3), (4) and (5), 22(1), 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Warning | |
| 2021-12-22 | UAB “IREC Baltic” | Developer of real estate | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9(3), (12), (13), (15), (17) and (18), Article 10(6) and (7), Article 16(2), Article 19(1), (3), (9) and (10), Article 20(3), Article 22(1) and (2), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2022-01-04 | UAB “ONTEX” | Real Estate Broker | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9(1), point (1), (12), (13), (14), (15), (16), (17) and (18), Article 10(6) and (7), Article 19(10), Article 22(1) and (2), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | |
| 2022-01-04 | UAB “OPPA Agency” | Real Estate Broker | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9(1), point (1), (12), (13), (14), (15), (16), (17) and (18), Article 10(6) and (7), Article 19(1), (7), (8), (9) and (10), Article 22(1) and (2), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | |
| 2022-01-26 | JF Investments | Real Estate Broker | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9(1), points 1, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18, Article 10(6) and (7), Article 19(1), (3), (7), (8), (9) and (10), Article 22(1) and (2), Article 29(1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Warning | |
| 2022-01-26 | UAB “Danesta LT” | Developer of real estate | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Articles 9(3), 19(1) and (3), 20(3), 22(1) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine |
The decision may be appealed to the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court in accordance with the procedure laid down by the Law on Administrative Proceedings of the Republic of Lithuania within one month of receipt of the decision. An appeal to court shall not suspend the enforcement of a decision, except for a decision to impose the penalties laid down in this Lawn and a decision to withdraw a licence or authorisation to pursue activities, where such a decision has been adopted by the supervisory authority other than the body that issued the licence or authorisation to pursue activities to another obliged entity.
Last updated: 26-04-2024