Applied measures for breaches of the AML-CFT law 2024
| Date | Entity subject to an impack measure (name) | Type | Violations of legislation | Impact measures | Information on complaints about sanctions measures |
| 2024-01-11 | UAB „Memel Land“ | Real Estate Broker | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9 point (12), (14), (15) and (18), Article 10 point (6-6), Article 19 point (3), Article 20 point (3) and (5), Article 22 point (1) and (2), Article 29 point (1) and (2) of the AML-CFT law | Fine | |
| 2024-01-29 | UAB „Similit“ | Company service provider | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9 point (3), (12), (15), (18), Article 20 point (3) and (5), Article 22 point (1) and (2), Article 29 point (1) of the AML-CFT law | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2024-02-19 | MB „EMI group“ | Company service provider | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9 point (3), (12), (13), (15), (18), Article 10 point (6,5-6), Article 14 point (1-2, 3,4), (10), Article 19 point (3) and (10), Article 20 point (3), Article 22 point (1) and (2), Article 29 point (1-4) of the AML-CFT law | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2024-03-27 | UAB „Transfer Light“ | Operator of virtual currency exchanges and depository virtual currency wallets | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 7 point (1), Article 32 point (1- 1, 2, 5) of the AML-CFT law | Fine | |
| 2024-05-10 | UAB „Coinumm“ | Operator of virtual currency exchanges and depository virtual currency wallets | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9 points (12, 14, 23), Article 11 points (1-4-b), Article 14 points (1-4, 1-5, 5), Article 19 point (7), Article 20 points (31, 5), Article 22 point (1), Article 29 point (1-5, 2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | |
| 2024-07-02 | UAB „Payeer“ | Operator of virtual currency exchanges and depository virtual currency wallets | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 7 point (1), Article 19 points (7), Article Article 20 points (31, 5), Article 22 point (1,2), Article 29 point (1-2, 1-5, 1-6, 1-7, 3-2, 4, 5), Article 32 point (1-4) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2024-07-30 | UAB „Mutrezga“ | Operator of virtual currency exchanges and depository virtual currency wallets | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 7 point (1), Article 32 point (1-1, 1-2, 1-5) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | |
| 2024-09-24 | UAB „Moneyamber“ | Operator of virtual currency exchanges and depository virtual currency wallets | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 7 point (1), Article 22 point (1,2), Article 25 point (5), Article 29 point (1-2, 1-4, 1-5) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2024-09-27 | UAB „Justicija“ | Company service provider | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9 point (12, 13, 15), Article 10 point (6-6), Article 17 point (1,2) Article 22 point (1), Article 25 point (2) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
| 2024-12-12 | UAB „Gofaizen & Sherle“ | Company service provider | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9 point (1-1), Article 12 point (1,7), Article 22 point (2), Article 29 point (1-1) of the AML-CFT law. | Warning | Complaint made |
| 2024-12-19 | UAB „Paysera“ | Electronic money institution | Breaches of the requirements laid down in Article 9 point (16) of the AML-CFT law. | Fine | Complaint made |
The decision may be appealed to the Vilnius Regional Administrative Court in accordance with the procedure laid down by the Law on Administrative Proceedings of the Republic of Lithuania within one month of receipt of the decision. An appeal to court shall not suspend the enforcement of a decision, except for a decision to impose the penalties laid down in this Lawn and a decision to withdraw a licence or authorisation to pursue activities, where such a decision has been adopted by the supervisory authority other than the body that issued the licence or authorisation to pursue activities to another obliged entity.
Last updated: 14-03-2025